Buying a modern contact center platform is no longer a routine procurement task. For large organisations, a CCaaS decision now shapes how teams handle customer conversations, govern AI, manage fraud and impersonation risk, and adapt as legacy systems disappear.
Yet many organisations still run RFPs as if none of that has changed. They treat CCaaS like a feature checklist instead of a long-term operating decision. That mismatch between how teams buy and how platforms actually work is where most contact center failures start.
The global CCaaS market is expected to expand from about $7.9 billion in 2025 to $9.4 billion in 2026, representing ~19% CAGR driven by strong enterprise adoption of cloud contact centre platforms, indicating the rapid growth of the contact center.
Related Articles
- Contact Center Deployment and Adoption: How to Make CCaaS and AI Work After Go-Live
- The Modern Contact Center: From Legacy Platforms to Cloud CCaaS and AI–Led Operations
This contact center RFP guide helps CX, contact center, IT, security, and compliance leaders evaluate cloud and AI platforms with sharper focus. The goal is simple: balance innovation with control, and automation with accountability.
Why Traditional Contact Center RFPs No Longer Work
Legacy RFPs were built for static, on-premises contact centers. Modern CCaaS platforms change constantly. They integrate deeply with enterprise systems and rely more on AI to guide decisions in real time.
The problem is not effort. It’s misalignment. According to Macronet Services:
“CCaaS is no longer simply a decision about telephony outsourcing or omnichannel enablement. It has become a strategic platform choice that shapes data architecture, operational resilience, regulatory posture, and brand experience.”
Many RFPs still prioritise channel counts, surface features, and roadmap promises. They often ignore the areas that now define risk and resilience, such as AI governance, data rights, identity controls, operational accountability, and exit flexibility.
In cloud contact center programmes, bad decisions rarely fail fast. Instead, problems surface months or years later as compliance gaps, rising fraud, poor agent experience, opaque AI behaviour, or expensive replatforming projects.
A modern CCaaS RFP must reflect how contact centers actually run today, not how vendors market their platforms.
Set the Right Context Before You Define Requirements
Strong RFPs start with internal clarity, not vendor outreach. Teams need a shared view of their current state before they define success.
Most organisations fall into one of three groups:
- Some still run heavily customised on-prem or legacy platforms and need stability, coexistence, and controlled change.
- Others already use CCaaS and want stronger AI orchestration, visibility, and governance.
- A smaller group runs cloud-native contact centers and prioritises speed, extensibility, and safe experimentation.
Each scenario demands a different mix of risk, flexibility, and control. An RFP that ignores this context will favour platforms that look impressive in isolation but fail under real operating pressure.
What a Modern CCaaS and AI RFP Must Cover
A strong contact center RFP defines how the platform will operate and stay accountable over time, not just what it does on day one.
Start with cloud architecture. Buyers should clearly separate true cloud-native platforms from hosted legacy systems. That difference affects scale, resilience, update cycles, and how much control the business keeps as the platform evolves.
Migration support matters just as much. Enterprises need clear answers on hybrid coexistence, delayed legacy shutdowns, downtime handling, and how vendors manage roadmap-driven change.
Visibility is critical. Buyers must understand what control they keep as updates roll out, especially when those updates add AI features or change existing workflows.
How to Evaluate AI Claims Without Falling for Demos
AI dominates CCaaS marketing, but features alone don’t prove readiness.
A serious RFP examines how teams apply AI in live interactions. It asks where AI makes decisions, where it advises humans, and how teams can explain, audit, and override those decisions. Marie Angselius of Customer Think emphasizes the need for technology to be grounded in operational reality:
“AI Agents have the potential to revolutionize contact centers, but without real customer insight and strong security measures, they can become liabilities rather than assets.”
Buyers should also demand clarity on model training, data sources, third-party models, and update cycles. In regulated environments, teams cannot accept vague answers about training data, model drift, or performance monitoring.
Most importantly, the RFP must define accountability. When AI causes customer harm, compliance exposure, or service failure, someone must own the outcome. AI that lacks governance will eventually create risk, no matter how well it performs in a demo.
Address Security, Fraud, and Identity Risk Early
Contact center security now sits directly in the customer experience.
Fraudsters increasingly target contact centers using AI-driven impersonation, synthetic voices, and social engineering. Weak identity checks and inconsistent controls across channels make those attacks easier.
A strong RFP forces clarity. It asks how platforms verify identity across voice and digital channels, detect abnormal behaviour in real time, and control access for agents, supervisors, and admins. It also defines data residency, regulatory alignment, and incident response in contractual terms, not marketing language.
Security failures rarely appear during selection. They show up during high-risk moments, such as account changes, payment disputes, or service outages. Fixing them during procurement costs far less than fixing them in production.
Who Needs a Seat at the CCaaS Buying Table
Successful contact center purchases always involve multiple teams.
CX and contact center leaders own experience outcomes. IT teams own architecture, integration, and resilience. Security and compliance teams manage data, identity, and regulatory risk. Operations teams understand real workflow complexity. Finance and procurement assess long-term cost and contract exposure.
When one function drives the RFP alone, the platform optimises for that group and fails everyone else. Early, shared ownership produces requirements that match real use, real risk, and real operating conditions.
This collaboration matters even more when teams introduce AI, because responsibility for AI performance rarely sits with a single owner.
Reduce AI Risk Through Better RFP Design
An RFP represents one of the last chances to set clear rules before AI becomes part of daily operations.
Buyers reduce risk when they define ownership for AI outcomes, governance processes, and success metrics upfront. That includes who tunes models, who adjusts routing logic, and who approves changes after go-live.
Exit planning matters too. Teams should understand how to export data, analytics, and AI-derived insights, how portable configurations are, and what happens to historical data at contract end. These details shape long-term leverage and flexibility.
AI works best when teams treat it as an operating capability, not a feature bundle.
Run a Smarter, Safer RFP Process
The process itself matters as much as the technology.
Teams that modernise successfully test real scenarios instead of scripted demos. They ask for proof from live environments. They judge vendor transparency as carefully as feature depth, knowing platforms change constantly.
Fast decisions often lead to repeat modernisation. Deliberate, reality-based procurement usually modernises once.
Final Takeaway: Choose Accountability Over Appearances
Modern contact centers rely on cloud platforms and AI-driven workflows. Long-term success depends on how teams govern those capabilities.
A strong contact center RFP reduces risk by assigning responsibility, preserving control, and grounding decisions in operational reality. It ensures cloud and AI investments deliver resilience, trust, and adaptability, not just short-term gains.
The rule still holds:
Buy the contact center platform you can govern — not the one with the best demo.
