Trust or Bust: How to Secure Contact Center AI

Explore the promise, the pitfalls, and the path forward for deploying contact center AI

3
Sponsored Post
Trust or Bust: How to Secure Contact Center AI
Contact CenterConversational AIInsights

Published: August 11, 2025

Guest Blogger

AI is redefining customer interactions, but its rapid rise has brought an equally rapid emergence of risk.

From hallucinations to compliance breaches, the pressure to deploy customer-facing AI agents at scale has collided with a lack of control, transparency, and testing.

Cyara’s AI Trust suite was born from this friction, and it’s quickly becoming essential in turning generative AI (GenAI) promise into production-grade reality.

Origins Rooted in Risk

The AI Trust suite emerged in response to a now-familiar pain point: bots veering off-script with misleading or unsafe responses.

Infamous gaffes that include virtual agents swearing at customers, taking offence, and even telling people to break the law exemplify the risk within the service space.

To address this, Cyara developed the AI Trust testing suite, an AI testing solution with modules designed to expose the unique risks of generative AI. The latest module, AI Trust Misuse, detects and flags inappropriate or off-brand bot behavior in the development stage.

Complementing this is the AI Trust FactCheck module, which identifies factual inaccuracies and hallucinations that LLMs are known to produce.

Speaking to CX Today, Christoph Börner, VP of Engineering at Cyara, explained: “Trust is the main currency for AI-driven customer engagements or experiences.”

“As AI continues to reshape, the contact center landscape will also reshape. We know that new challenges will keep emerging, and we will evolve our approach to these new challenges.”

FactCheck: Validating AI Responses Against Real Data

FactCheck is one of the suite’s powerful modules, a reality check for LLM outputs.

The concept is simple but critical: validate AI-generated responses against a “source of truth,” whether it’s a product knowledge base, policy library, or technical manual. Responses are audited with color-coded feedback to flag factual errors and partial matches, which teams can use to QA and refine their models.

FactCheck most frequently finds issues involving fabricated product specifications, outdated policy terms, and incorrect procedural guidance.

Bridging the Proof-of-Concept Gap

Despite surging investment in AI-powered CX, only a fraction of projects cross the chasm into production. Indeed, approximately 70 percent are still stuck in the pilot or testing phase, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The AI Trust suite offers much-needed scaffolding, helping organizations build confidence by exposing hidden risks before customers do.

On this, Börner added: “One of the biggest problems for our clients is the ‘what to do next question.’ Especially when it’s about testing AI, these language models are extremely big, and running a test here could end up with 10,000 issues being found.”

Helping contact centers take the leap of faith from proof of concept, the AI Trust Misuse module evaluates customer interactions to identify hate speech, fraud, and other topics contact centers restrict, empowering them to detect and prevent incidents of malicious intent or harmful content generation.

Speed vs. Assurance: No Longer a Trade-Off

Generative AI demands agility, but that shouldn’t come at the cost of accuracy or safety. Cyara approaches testing as part of the development lifecycle, not an afterthought.

Automated evaluations allow teams to iterate quickly while maintaining tight governance over conversational AI performance and compliance. As Börner summarized:

“We are not building these things just because we think that’s the next big thing to do; we’re building them based on the challenges that our clients face.”

To check out the full AI Trust suite, find out more here: https://cyara.com/products/cyara-ai-trust/

AI AgentsArtificial IntelligenceCCaaSGenerative AI
Featured

Share This Post